OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  xacml  ·  2002-02

xacml — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Re: [xacml] RE: policy model, part 1


i have the same question. i *think* that what is meant here is what i think of as 'nullable' ('non existent value is valid'). if my assuption is true then sekhar's definition would be rephrased: /* So basically, the interpretation is that a LACK OF SUBJECT is EQUIVALENT TO AnySubject. */ ...which, to answer the question, results in 'no value' being the representation of 'nil', er... 'null' b Polar Humenn wrote: > Sekhar, > > How is "nil" represented for "nillable". > > -Polar

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]