Re: [wsbpel] BP compliance analysis for WSDL examples in WS-BPEL spec

[Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>]

amy lewis, our WSD committee member, has opened a dialog with the maintainers about this.  she suggests that our committee open a formal query.

Liu, Kevin wrote:

Hi Paul,

That was an error in BP1.0. the BP1.0 errata has corrected that, see
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.0-errata-2004-03-17.html#er015

But you are right that the schema at http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/2003-02-11.xsd needs to be updated. I will raise that issue to WS-I.

Best Regards,
Kevin
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul R Brown [mailto:prb@fivesight.com] 
Sent: Friday, Sep 17, 2004 09:34 PM
To: Liu, Kevin
Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Diane Jordan; Satish Thatte; Trickovic, Ivana
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] BP compliance analysis for WSDL examples in WS-BPEL spec



Hi, Kevin --

  

I took an action item in our San Francisco F2F to go through the WSDL 
examples in the current spec and determine if they are conformant to 
the WS-I Basic Profile.
[...]
    

If I'm not mistaken, there are some more fundamental issues with the 
example WSDL documents as well.  The WSDL schema cited for use in the 
BP (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/2003-02-11.xsd) requires that 
extensibility elements be placed *before* any of the standard WSDL 
elements.  In the case of the example in section 6.1, this means that 
the partnerLink definitions should occur before the other elements 
(messages, portTypes, etc.) as opposed to after.

I haven't looked at other examples in the spec to see if this needs to 
be applied elsewhere as well.

	-- Paul


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.