virtio — archive

[Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 05:06:31PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:01:41 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > We already have a specification for conformance targets for > > non-transitional devices. > > Just add another clause that transitional devices satisfy. > > > > VIRTIO-167 > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > --- > > conformance.tex | 8 ++ ------ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex > > index 6df113b..8b69e39 100644 > > --- a/conformance.tex > > +++ b/conformance.tex > > @@ -341,13 +341,9 @@ A conformant implementation MUST be either transitional or > > non-transitional, see \ref{intro:Legacy > > Interface: Terminology}. > > > > -A non-transitional implementation conforms to this specification > > -if it satisfies all of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements > > -defined above. > > - > > -An implementation MAY choose to implement OPTIONAL support for the > > +A transitional implementation MUST implement support for the > > legacy interface, including support for legacy drivers > > -or devices, by additionally conforming to all of the MUST or > > +or devices, by conforming to all of the MUST or > > REQUIRED level requirements for the legacy interface > > for the transitional devices and drivers. > > > > Wouldn't that be v4? Donnu :( > I'm currently very confused by the avalanche of patches and which issues > they fix... It could be easiest to follow links under ballots. Each ballot is linked to the patch. -- MST