Re: [ubl] Issue: two-letter or three-letter language codes?

[Mikkel Hippe Brun <mhb@tradeshift.com>]

I think that this would be a major version change breaking compatibility. I see no good reason for such a change.

Regards

Mikkel

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Jon Bosak <bosak@pinax.com> wrote:

Hello UBL TC and developers,

A question has arisen with regard to language codes. �It appears that
UN/CEFACT uses the ISO three-letter lowercase language codes, whereas
UBL currently includes a list of ISO two-letter uppercase language codes
(both are ISO standards as far as we know). �We're not going to be
inclined to change something in 2.1 that already shipped in 2.0, so the
question is: does anyone know of a good reason why UBL should switch to
the three-letter lowercase form?

We need to have this issue resolved by next week, so if anyone has an
opinion, please let us know ASAP.

Jon

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. �Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php