ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] UBL and UN/CEFACT - planned activities and next steps -ADDENDUM

From: Tim McGrath
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:28:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl] UBL and UN/CEFACT - planned activities and next steps -ADDENDUM

From: Tim McGrath <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:30:51 +0800

my apologies this was not what was intended.  what i thought i was 
proposing was that we use this requirement as a way of extending the 
Architectural and Construction aspects of e-tendering with that of 
governments.  i am sorry this seemed like competition, it was intended 
as exactly the opposite.

however, i respect Sylvia's comment and am happy to withdraw the proposal.

Crawford, Mark wrote:

>Tim,
>I.MHO UBL will kill any relationship with CEFACT if it pursues being competitive with the first major CEFACT schema development effort.
>
>Kind regards,
>Mark:
>
>Mark Crawford
>Standards Architect
>SAP Labs
>
>