ubl — archive

RE: [ubl] Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 3 May 2006

From: Stephen Green
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:17:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl] Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 3 May 2006




From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 08:21:23 -0600






The thinking - was it on the Pacific call? - was that we
want to provide genericode files even for the ATG2 codelists
so then at least the 'listURI' attributes need to be fixed
so that these codelists can be restricted in implementations.
In short I think the NDR should allow both fixed and default
and spreadsheet/modellers should specify which is used for which
but if this had to be simplified (such as for EF) I'd say the
simplest is to make all default and either put that in the rule
or just in the spreadsheet. (By 'spreadsheet' I mean uDT.)

Thanks

Steve


Quoting Grimley Michael J NPRI <[email protected]>:

>
> I have just been informed that I have to support a meeting @ 1300 
> that requires travel; therefore, I will be unable to attend today's 
> call.
>
>
>>      SG: We need an agreement in this week's Atlantic call
>>      regarding the rule about code list attributes, default
>>      vs. fixed -- we only want default, and at the moment they
>>      are all fixed; see emails over the last week from TM and SG.
>>      We need to finalize this.
>
>
> I have no objection to making them 'default'.
>
> Do we want to create two rules, one for the Code Lists we adopt from 
> ATG 2 (these can remain fixed) and one for all others (where we allow 
> default)?
>
>
>
>