ubl — archive

RE: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 19|20 September 2005

From: Sylvia Webb
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:53:00 -0000

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

Subject: RE: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 19|20 September 2005

From: "Sylvia Webb" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:52:14 -0700

Jon,

The PSC met yesterday and discussed this item in detail. It was agreed that
the PSC recommendation to the TC is for the UBL_Amount be removed from the
UBL qDT and replaced by the ATG2 Amount in the uDT. The PSC also recommends
that the TC continue to maintain our own qualified DTs when ATG2 unqualified
DT's do not meet our requirements for specialized codes.

"ACTION: TM and SG to examine the latest ATG2 draft and report
   back this meeting as to whether it meets our requirements.

      SG: Discussed this in email on the list.  It looks like the
      ATG2 schemas haven't changed, so everything we've said in
      the past still applies.  The only outstanding question is
      whether we need to create our own qualified DTs; my feeling
      is that we do need to have codes using amount to have
      supplementary component attributes, and this requirement is
      enough to justify adding UBL amount as a qualified DT.  But
      I understand and could accept the view that we should keep
      to ATG2 amount.

      JB: Will put this on the Atlantic agenda."

Regards,
Sylvia