ubl — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->ubl message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)
- From: [email protected]
- To: [email protected]
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
[[email protected]:] | <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>One of the fundamental problems with the library is = | the Lack of consistently applied object qualifiers. This makes any = | harmonization extremely difficult if not impossible, and leads to a = | questionable conformance to ccts. The use of property terms and = | qualifiers is equally problematic in the way we have done it. Until and = | unless we begin to base our Bies on CCs we will have a disconnected = | inconsistant library that manifests itself in the form of inconsistent = | schema.<BR> I will put this on the work list for UBL 1.1. Jon
- References:
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]