ubl — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [ebxml-dev] A practical question on Core components storage, UBL, OAG, etc
Joseph,
Thanks for your feedback. It is not a bad idea to store them both as
CCs and <classify> one as preferred.
You correctly remind me that CCs are supposed to be syntax neutral but
if I am going to store them in a regsitry then I do need to represent
them somehow. I don't see any reason to re-invent the UBL convention of
using XSD schema and annotations for the dictionary names. I'm not
aware of a recommendation from UN/CEFACT on an XML representation of CCs
for storage and reference purposes. Even if there is one (that is
different to UBL) I don't thing we would bother to re-engineer UBL to
fit at this stage of our pilot project. Do you think that is a
reasonable position?
Regards,
Steve Capell
RedWahoo
Sydney, Australia
Tel : +61 410 437854
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]