ubl — archive

[Stig Korsgaard]

Hi Eve, Of course you are not a pain, but I guess we all know the feeling of pushing send to an e-mail knowing that seconds after it will hit you like a boomerang shaped in the size of a B2 bomber! On the questions we have not experience enough to actually give the answers you are looking for! What I realized is that we have designed from the point of view that if we do not want to reuse an element why make it global. This feature is allowed in Venetian Blind, as you for sure already know! Also the possibility to localize namespaces has been a wish while although not crucial. A third thin is that I have a feeling about context playing a role, but that is still far from clear enough for me to start comment on this. It does not imply though that the current UBL approach would mean the end of the world for us. We could fairly simple go from our current approach to the current preferred of NDR/UBL, but since the decision is still up for grabs, we just gave our opinion, to wich we stand. Anyway I guess this is perhaps what it is and that is a question of religion! It is though still much easier to make elements global in Venetian Blind than it is to localize in Garden of Eden. Best Regards Stig Korsgaard M.Sc.E., Standardisation Coordinator Danish Bankers Association Tel: +45 33 70 10 83 Cell: +45 21 21 82 34 Fax: +45 33 93 02 60 E-mail: stk@finansraadet.dk