ubl — archive

[ubl] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposal 3 in our CCTS feedback [ and other CCTScomments ]

From: Tim McGrath
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:15:00 -0000

as a matter of procedure, i suggest we promote this debate and any other CCTS comment discussions to the 'UBL list' ([email protected]) this topic is relevant to LCSC, NDR and all UBL members. So that we keep co-ordinated, it has been agreed that Bill, Lisa and I will be the editing team for UBL comments to the CCTS. Here is the current status of play... * Bill is tasked with rewording proposal 1 "The CC model should include the concept of property" * Bill and Tim reword proposal 2 "Specify that the name of a property (i.e. Property Term) describes the use of a Basic Core Component by an Aggregate Core Component." * Eve needs to reword/crispen proposal 3 "Only 'Representation Term' be used for CC definitions and that Core Component Types become redundant." {some further discussion on this already} * Sue/Arofan will reword proposal 4 "Have a set of Representation Terms, which function as "semantic primitives,"" We shall be putting out a revised version of the complete submission for review over this forthcoming weekend (april 27-28). This gives us time to have a list discussion before we present a near-to-final draft for the LCSC meeting Tuesday and the NDR on the Wednesday. We can then make (editorial) mods before submitting it to CCTS on the Friday. -- regards tim mcgrath fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142