[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2295) STDEVA
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18396#action_18396 ]
Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-2295:
-----------------------------------------
Considering that not all of the functions with A (and without) seem consistent out in the world, according to the notes, this does seem to be a problem. My question is more about the implications of ratifying STDEVA in a standard in a way that does not seem to improve interoperability very well in the cases it is defined for.
I guess another way of asking my question is, do we consider this the responsible thing to do?
> STDEVA
> -------
>
> Key: OFFICE-2295
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2295
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: OpenFormula
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Andreas Guelzow
> Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 1
>
>
> == 6.17.71 STDEVA ==
> The text "cells with text are converted to 0;" conflicts with "The
> handling of strings is implementation defined."
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]