legalxml-sc — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-ms] Transcripts TC membership needed
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-ms] Transcripts TC membership needed
- From: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG-DAY)" <[email protected]>
- To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'SC'" <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:54:51 -0500
I, for one believe that transcripts are a very different and distinct doctype from a basic court document. We should when the effort is restarted, design around a harmonization with the vocabulary used across the Member Section wherever practical. I would not want to spread court filing any thinner than it is today. Regards, Don Donald L. Bergeron Systems Designer [email protected] 937-865-1276 O 937-748-2775 H 937-672-7781 M
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]