Re: [docbook] Add "danger" to the list of possible admonitions?

[Thomas Schraitle <tom_schr@web.de>]

Hi Frank,

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:33:51 +0200
Frank Arensmeier <farensmeier@gmail.com> wrote:

> I totally agree with Thomas. As Thomas pointed out, there is an
> industry standard in Europe (maybe in other parts of the world too?)
> saying that you actually must differentiate between hazard
> statements. And danger is used to express a high risk of injury
> and/or death, whereas "caution" is actually something else. We’ve
> been "solving" this kind of issue before by introducing <caution
> role="danger">.

Thanks Frank for pointing it out so much better than I could do. :))


> However, a more "generic" element would feel much better. And Dave...
> no, it’s not about CSS or other styling. It’s actually an element
> something that lots of our clients need.

Thanks Frank for confirming there is a need for that. :-)


-- 
Gruß/Regards,
    Thomas Schraitle