Re: [cti] Attack Motivations

[Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com>]

What about unknown? Or unspecified?

 

I know the field is currently optional but these might still be valid assignments to the field to convey.

 

So not including the field is not the same as assigning to undefined/unknown and conveying that.

 

 

 

From: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 9:15 PM
To: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [cti] Attack Motivations

 

All,

 

Intrusion Sets and Threat Actors both use the Attack Motivations vocabulary.  Right now we have the following terms in that vocab:

 

1. accidental
2. coercion
3. dominance
4. ideology
5. notoriety
6. organizational-gain
7. personal-gain
8. personal-satisfaction
9. revenge
10. unpredictable

 

 

I propose that we add the following thee terms to this list, I missed them when I was putting this list together.  

 

1. amusement
2. advantage (competitive, political, economic)
3. anarchy

 

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Bret

 

 

 

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."