> That qualifies as a neat reversal of polarity.
Not at all. I, and others never claimed that the primary use case for
XML schema is for validation. Perhaps you just assumed that along with
a few other things. Take the time to listen and consider, you might
just find out something that will help your Basilage talk go all the
better.
Fraser.
On 09/04/2013, Simon St.Laurent <> wrote:
> On 4/9/13 3:21 PM, John Cowan wrote:
>> When you publish a set of documents, publishing the schema to which you
>> claim they conform is very useful for everyone. For one thing, it's
>> concrete, testable documentation about what to expect from you. This is
>> the opposite of the "normal" use of schemas as input validation: here
>> they are serving as *output* validation as well as documentation.
>
> That qualifies as a neat reversal of polarity.
>
> Just don't cross the streams!
>
> (And how long is the schema good for? A given set of documents? More?)
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> http://simonstl.com/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
