Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"

xml-dev · December 2011 · 10 messages · back to month

#	Subject	From	Date
00049	Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Costello, Roger L.	2011-12-17 19:50
00054	RE: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	David Lee	2011-12-17 20:16
00115	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Henry Luo	2011-12-18 06:37
00125	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Liam R E Quin	2011-12-18 07:50
00096	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Michael Sokolov	2011-12-18 13:02
00085	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	James Fuller	2011-12-18 19:27
00086	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Michael Kay	2011-12-18 20:17
00095	RE: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Len Bullard	2011-12-18 21:06
00100	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	Kurt Cagle	2011-12-20 02:41
00137	Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes"	[email protected]	2011-12-20 12:18