On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:01:11 +0700
James Clark <> wrote:
> I wrote a post describing a fairly minimal subset of XML:
>
> http://blog.jclark.com/2010/12/microxml.html
>
> James
On Namespaces:
"the xmlns attribute (not xmlns:x, just bare xmlns). However, as far as
the MicroXML data model is concerned, it's just another attribute. It
thus works in a very similar way to xml:lang: "
Lovely simple namespace change. How hard would it be to explain
inheritance to a newbie? Ten times easier than the current system.
I don't see any utility in the ns prefix ideas though James? Just
more complexity?
Wouldn't it be easier to require a transform back to XML 1.0 format?
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
