Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts?
xml-dev · April 2010 · 6 messages · back to month
| # | Subject | From | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00001 | Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts? | Costello, Roger L. | 2010-04-08 12:06 |
| 00033 | RE: [xml-dev] Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts? | [email protected] | 2010-04-08 12:23 |
| 00029 | Re: [xml-dev] Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts? | David Carlisle | 2010-04-08 12:25 |
| 00099 | Re: [xml-dev] Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts? | David | 2010-04-08 12:31 |
| 00056 | RE: [xml-dev] Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts? | Michael Kay | 2010-04-08 13:33 |
| 00114 | RE: [xml-dev] Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts? | [email protected] | 2010-04-08 13:40 |