Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?

xml-dev · June 2009 · 12 messages · back to month · +1 message in 1 other month

#	Subject	From	Date
00168	Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Costello, Roger L.	2009-06-15 21:10
00149	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Michael Kay	2009-06-15 22:41
00137	Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Frank Manola	2009-06-16 14:58
00160	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Costello, Roger L.	2009-06-17 11:55
00192	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Michael Kay	2009-06-17 12:42
00197	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Costello, Roger L.	2009-06-17 13:28
00191	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Michael Kay	2009-06-17 14:36
00155	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Costello, Roger L.	2009-06-17 15:29
00159	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Costello, Roger L.	2009-06-17 17:42
00151	Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Frank Manola	2009-06-17 19:28
00161	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Michael Kay	2009-06-17 22:24
00162	RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?	Jim Tivy	2009-06-18 16:12