| 00160 |
ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-11 21:38 |
| 00170 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 22:37 |
| 00140 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-11 22:50 |
| 00124 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 23:03 |
| 00168 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Daniel L. Koger
|
2008-02-11 23:50 |
| 00186 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-11 23:51 |
| 00184 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 02:13 |
| 00097 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 02:16 |
| 00106 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 03:06 |
| 00162 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 03:11 |
| 00154 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 03:19 |
| 00152 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-12 07:28 |
| 00107 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 09:50 |
| 00105 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 10:03 |
| 00099 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 10:09 |
| 00149 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-12 10:49 |
| 00108 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 11:17 |
| 00098 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 11:25 |
| 00181 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 12:31 |
| 00128 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 12:31 |
| 00138 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 12:56 |
| 00135 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Joe Fawcett
|
2008-02-12 13:46 |
| 00187 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-12 14:42 |
| 00169 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 14:52 |
| 00127 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 15:21 |
| 00183 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Joe Fawcett
|
2008-02-12 15:51 |
| 00171 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-12 16:33 |
| 00175 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 16:36 |
| 00137 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 16:52 |
| 00141 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 16:53 |
| 00148 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 17:27 |
| 00095 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 17:39 |
| 00109 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 17:43 |
| 00110 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-12 17:54 |
| 00093 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Julian Reschke
|
2008-02-12 18:05 |
| 00151 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 18:12 |
| 00164 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 18:43 |
| 00153 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-12 19:31 |
| 00259 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-13 09:18 |
| 00242 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-13 10:11 |
| 00221 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
John Snelson
|
2008-02-14 17:35 |
| 00230 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Philip Fearon
|
2008-02-14 22:55 |
| 00217 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Tim Bray
|
2008-02-15 00:30 |
| 00232 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-15 05:50 |
| 00216 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-15 09:35 |
| 00290 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Jirka Kosek
|
2008-02-15 10:45 |
| 00276 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
John Snelson
|
2008-02-15 11:53 |
| 00218 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-15 15:47 |
| 00256 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 02:47 |
| 00285 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-16 03:35 |
| 00281 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:33 |
| 00272 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:35 |
| 00225 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:35 |
| 00228 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:39 |
| 00235 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:43 |
| 00209 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-18 17:02 |
| 00280 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-18 17:23 |
| 00248 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-18 17:28 |
| 00223 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-18 17:31 |
| 00253 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 18:59 |
| 00261 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 19:04 |
| 00314 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-18 19:30 |
| 00319 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Jim Melton
|
2008-02-18 20:27 |
| 00334 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Tim Bray
|
2008-02-19 19:22 |
| 00390 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Tim Bray
|
2008-02-19 19:31 |
| 00376 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-19 19:59 |
| 00303 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-20 08:54 |
| 00354 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 15:56 |
| 00352 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 16:01 |
| 00305 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Manos Batsis
|
2008-02-20 16:30 |
| 00298 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
David Carver
|
2008-02-20 20:32 |
| 00304 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
[email protected]
|
2008-02-21 04:39 |
| 00371 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-21 15:39 |
| 00364 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
David Carver
|
2008-02-21 16:40 |
| 00361 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-21 23:35 |
| 00415 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-22 06:33 |
| 00488 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
|
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-22 14:11 |
