Simon St.Laurent a écrit :
> I'd love to be able to issue GET, PUT, POST, and DELETE against document
> fragments, but the fragment identifier approach isn't going to work, and
> I've not (yet) found anything nearly as expressive that goes into the
> URL outside of the fragment identifier space.
Ugly hack : %-encode the # character for pushing it to the server
REST-style services could agree on the convention that this character
stands for the fragment identifier ; it might appear either in the path
or in the last parameter of the query string.
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
