RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lyon [mailto:]
> Sent: 05 March 2005 03:35
> To: Bob Foster
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is
> missing from the UCS ?
> 
> 
> In any case, functionality in data representation is way more important
> than cosmetics.

Tell that to Joan Collins.