Joseph,
Your assumptions about my original question were correct. However,
the resulting discussion that has arisen in this thread is of equal
interest to me.
Thanks,
Kenneth
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:47:21 -0500, Chiusano Joseph
<> wrote:
> I took the reference to "without altering the original definition" as
> referring to the definition of the simple type (the "A", "B", and "C"
> choices) - in which case the solution I proposed would meet that
> requirement. But I agree that it is unclear as to whether the original
> poster intended *any* definition, in which case I would ask that they
> clarify.
>
