Elliotte,
You'd be surprised the number of companies that still
use floppy disks to send out data. So many find they
can use CSV because it fits on a floppy, and are unable
to use xml because it won't fit.
I don't think it's a perfect world. but that's just
how it is.
Quoting Elliotte Harold <>:
> wrote:
>
>
> >>>In XML 1.0, we have a larger file with no type information
> >>>and in the computergrid format, we have type information as
> >>>well as a saving of around 35% or 2,680,000 bytes.
> >>>
> >>
> >>It's smaller, though somehow I doubt that's important....
> >
> >
> > Well, it can be important in a business context. People in
> > business don't have unlimited time. If a pricelist or any
> > document takes too long to load up... they'll simply
> > give the ctrl-alt-delete and give up. They have no love
> > for the computers, I can assure you.
>
> In 2005 I find it hard to believe any business computer or network would
> notice or care about a 2.5 MB savings. Perhaps if you were working in an
> embedded environment, but in that case you're probably not using XML
> anyway.
>
> --
> Elliotte Rusty Harold
> XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
