RE: [xml-dev] The Airplane Example (was Re: [xml-dev] StreamingXM L)

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Nathan Young' <>,
Date
2005-01-05T18:44:19Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] The Airplane Example (was Re: [xml-dev] StreamingXM L)
And some out-of-the-box thinking.  Similarity is one 
aspect of why redundancy fails.  When the Browns Ferry 
nuclear reactor almost melted down in the seventies, it 
had redundant systems.   The control lines ran down the 
same tray.   When some not-to-bright maintenance engineers 
were checking for leaks with a lit candle, they forgot 
that leaks suck as well as blow.  The insulation caught 
fire at the point where the control lines lay side by 
side, redundant but vulnerable.   Vulnerabilities are a 
different class of error handling which is why some 
Internet systems are demonstrating such poor results 
when under attack.

len


From: Nathan Young [mailto:]

I guess the main point is that effective redundancy should provide not  
just duplicate systems, but rather two or more entirely different ways of  
accomplishing the same thing.