RE: [xml-dev] dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: [xml-dev] R: [xml-dev] Number of active public XML schemas

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Peter Hunsberger' <>
Date
2004-11-03T16:00:17Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: [xml-dev] R: [xml-dev] Number of active public XML schemas
I won't go quite that far.   I may need to create a schema for 
others to inspect because I don't want to open up an ODBC 
connection for them to my metadata tables.   In that case, 
providing an XML Schema for them to consume or its analog 
(the mammals are relentless reinovators), makes sense. 
I agree that in the environment I work in, modeling in 
XML Schema isn't very useful.

len


From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:]

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:46:39 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
<> wrote:

> OTW, a property bag is a property bag is a property bag.

Or as Burak just wrote on the "Describing hierarchies with XML"  thread:

> [Singing the song of OO abstraction] "Model common things only once."

The fact is, the best model isn't always (ever? :-) an XML schema...