Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?]

From
Michael Champion <>
To
xml-dev DEV' <>
Date
2004-05-03T16:48:54Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?]
> Follow this thread, from July 2003 - it's the WSRM TC's response to the
> announcement of the WS-ReliableMessaging Spec Workshop:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200307/msg00008.html
>
>
Oh, we need to achieve loose coupling by defining all the WS-* specs in 
one cohesive unit.
That is clear to me now, thanks to the techniques of Doublethink and an 
application of the principles of Ingsoc to web services.  :-)

<politics-alert>
p.s.  My favorite illustration of how  the Three Principles of Ingsoc 
apply to modern problems is
http://www.studentsfororwell.org/shirt/1984.jpg
</politics-alert>
Next in thread → Next in month →