RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too ha rd for Aunt Trudie?

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Norman Gray' <>, Mike Fitzgerald <>
Date
2004-04-21T13:20:20Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too ha rd for Aunt Trudie?
First it is 'just for the human'; then it is, 
'why can't we make the wire more efficient', 
then, 'humans don't read this anyway because 
we have tools for that'.

It's just more stuff.

len


From: Norman Gray [mailto:]

Separating processors from syntax is why SAX is a Good Thing.