Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free (was: RE: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl)

From
Elliotte Rusty Harold <>
To
Date
2004-04-14T19:27:06Z
ID
<p0601020cbca340c9002f@[192.168.254.88]>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free (was: RE: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl)
At 1:03 PM -0400 4/14/04, Bob Wyman wrote:

>	In summary: The problem here isn't X.fws, ASN.1, etc... -- the
>problem, if any, is that the Schema language isn't expressive enough
>or that people are using the wrong data types in their schemas. If
>X.fws is used with properly defined, expressive schemas, these
>problems will not arise.

Again,that may not be the problem. People may well be using the right 
data types in *their* schemas for*their* needs. However *their* needs 
may not be *my* needs, and I may well be using a different schema as 
a result.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
Next in thread → Next in month →