Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list available

From
Karl Waclawek <>
To
Date
2004-04-12T16:48:36Z
ID
<007301c420ae$0001c1d0$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Bray" <>
To: "Dennis Sosnoski" <>
Cc: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <>; <>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:05 PM

> Two interesting questions are "Which specifications make no use of the 
> Infoset abstraction" (answer: I could go with "a few" or "too many") 
> and "Which applications make no use of the Infoset abstraction (answer: 
> "most").  -Tim

What does it mean "making use of the Infoset abstraction"?

As an example, would you say that an application which generates
SAX call-backs from an internal proprietary object model, for the
purpose of validation (or serialization), does *not* make use of
the Infoset abstraction?
It sure makes use of *some* abstraction, as it has to interpret a
proprietary data structure as if it was an XML document.

Karl