Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
> Bob Foster wrote:
>
>> Where did the "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" URI come from? The
>> Namespaces In XML spec specifically says: "The prefix xmlns is used
>> only for namespace bindings and is not itself bound to any namespace
>> name."
>> Am I missing some errata, or is there some complexity-multiplying
>> going on here? It sure seems like a SAX feature that should be dropped
>> should not be used to justify contradicting the namespaces
>> recommendation.
>
>
> Dereference http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/ for some clues.
I may be clueless, but I knew enough to do that. That's why I reread the
recommendation.
Bob
