Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> writes:
>>Hypertext is a particular application of linking, a more basic notion.
>>It's a mistake to think of links solely in the hypertext context.
>
> I don't think that changes the argument about the value of generic
> linking at all. To put it bluntly, "one linking mechanism to rule them
> all" is ridiculous on its face.
Blunt is fine, but this particular instance is tragically unhelpful. Why
is it ridiculous on its face, does it have a big red shiny nose or
something?
--
Robin Berjon
