Re: Updated XInclude DoC

Paul Grosso scripsit:
> 
> At 10:27 2004 01 21 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> >Here's an updated DoC with dispositions, new issues, and color coding -
> >yellow is for those with proposed resolutions (low hanging fruit!) and
> >pink is for those that need proposals.  I'll try to do a couple more
> >proposals soon but there should be enough there for next week already.

Here are my comments:

2.4:  I think that ERH's concerns are met if line-end characters are forbidden
in accept-* attributes.  Most other ASCII characters wind up being allowed
anyhow.

2.12:  Francois has already replied.

2.14:  Using parse="text" and an xpointer should mean that whatever the xpointer
points to is converted to text and included as such.

2.15:  Resolved by 2.11 resolution (fragids are illegal)

2.23:  Response:  "Noted.  Sorry we didn't do what you hoped for."

224:  Response:  "Noted.  Too bad.."

2.25:  Response:  "Noted.  We don't control the IRI spec."

-- 
John Cowan    www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.  I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.  --Bilbo