David Tolpin wrote:
>
> StartTagOpen/StartTagClose+EndTag vs startElement/endElement
>
> ...
>
> At the same time, if the API is on the level of tags, I want to say the tag
> is closed; in fact, I would prefer StartTagClose to be passed the tag's name
> argument, same about endTag. It would help me write better programs.
Perhaps StartStartTag or StartTagOpen or whatever can return an opaque
element reference (could be a pointer to an internal structure or simply
a nesting stack level count) which is then passed to StartTagClose and EndTag
to allow early detection of mismatches. A bit more lightweight than
passing the element name + namespace gubbins and maybe having to do
string compares.
