On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Rich Salz wrote:
> Why not just do everything in UTF-8. All this wchar_t, "asdfasdf"L
> support, etc., is going to complicate the API. Seems simpler to have
> the basic API, and for those not working in UTF-8 (or its subset:),
> they only have to remember a single consistent rule: call "convert()"
> first.
Now that's an attractive idea. I'd still probably retain the
genxCharacter(genxWriter * w, int character)
because I've seen all sorts of situations where you know what the U+
value is and just want to stuff that character into the stream. -Tim
