Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Unicode forms for internal storage

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> No, I don't plan to support XML 1.1, certainly not in XOM 1.0 and 
> beyond that not unless someone asks for it and demonstrates a real 
> need. This is discussed in the XOM FAQ at 
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/XOM/faq.xhtml#d0e183

Your more moderate remarks in "Fifty Ways To Lose Your XML Virginity"
have my full support, but I really do resent the word "abomination".
Perhaps I shall have to issue a rogue patch for XOM....

-- 
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)