Tim Bray wrote:
> John Cowan and others have suggested that genx should have a call to put
> in a DOCTYPE declaration. This would be trivial to add to the program
> but it bothers me, so I'm provisionally going to say that I'm not doing
> this because it's not Canonical XML and the use cases are thin.
>
> So this is a chance for people to say "I'd like to use genx for XXX, but
> I can't withou a DOCTYPE because of YYY." -Tim
I was planning on using genx for XHTML, for which
a DOCTYPE is required.
-joe
