> If someone wants to put a generic UTF-16 processor on top of genx,
> that would be fine. I don't see the demand for supporting it at the
> input end of genx because the UTF-16 centric languages like Java and
> C# have decent xml-writing software already. -Tim
Makes sense. One note, however; a C program might receive a UCS-16
string from elsewhere, eg a file or database, and want to pass it on
without processing.
Still, the conversion from UCS-16 to either UTF-8 or UCS-32 is
trivial...
Marc-Antoine Parent
