RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions

> He goes a bit overboard, but Mark Pilgrim makes some good points:
>     http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/01/14/thought_experiment
> (What, Mark going overboard?  I'm shocked I say, shocked.)  Don't lose
> his point: it's not necessarily invalid markup, but different character
> encodings, too.

He makes some very dubious points to. This is a true story, except it didn't
happen ;-)

Various responses:
http://icite.net/blog/200401/xml_exterminator.html

Cheers,
Danny.