Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

>  (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
>
>> Eric van der Vlist <> writes:
>>
>>> Is that an indication that the WG did really want to allow relative 
>>> URIs
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Oops -- should be 'No' -- it's there to allow absolute+fragid.

I am entirely missing the logic behind wanting to allow a fragid in a 
base URI.

Jonathan