Re: [xml-dev] Expertise and Innovation - was Re: [xml-dev] Non-Borg servers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation)

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
"' '" <>
Date
2004-01-10T05:23:19Z
ID
<r02000200-1028-1A4FAA4A432D11D8B1470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Expertise and Innovation - was Re: [xml-dev] Non-Borg servers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation)
 (Robert Koberg) writes:
>The post (which I looked for at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ 
>that only shows post up to 2003-12 -- thanks Simon) that cocked my 
>trigger was:
>
>http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200401/msg00115.html
>
>just a little too hard to stomach.

Funny.  That's the post where I concluded that a gratuitous argument
about a particular site had turned into a conversation worth following.

It's tough when Elliotte's that completely right, but it happens pretty
regularly.  Usually when I'm on the other side, unfortunately.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org