Re: [xml-dev] genx: canonicalization vs. pretty printing

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:40:22PM -0500, Aleksander Slominski wrote:
> i think that using something similiar to SAX setFeature/Property could 
> work pretty well to set optional properties such as indenting. 

-1

I strongly agree with Tim's design philosophy that genx should have as
few optional features as possible, ideally zero.  Furthermore, genx is
not an abstract specification for a family of compatible XML writers
It is a specific C library for generating valid XML output.

What you describe sounds like a good candidate for a set of SAX
extensions, actually.  :-)

Z.