Re: [xml-dev] patterns and restrictions

> - Is NaN equal to itself? Is NaN less than +INF and greater than -INF? If
> +INF and -INF are exclusive restrictions, do they fall within the range of their own?

I have just found answers to a part of this question in the errata. At the same 
time, I've discovered that to of implementations of XML Schema datatypes fail
to exclude NaN from the range of [-INF .. INF]. An, I'm sorry, +INF is wrong. INF is right.
Two legs better.

David