>John Cowan wrote:
> Of course, a *real* PER encoding of your email would be to
> encode the author as 01, and then leave the content to be
> reconstructed by the receiver. :-)
Alaric B Snell wrote:
> Am I that predictable? :-)
Does this imply a new, objective measure of the information
content of a mail message? i.e. the size of the PER encoding? Today,
many people have mail filters that reject messages that are too large.
Perhaps in the future, they would filter out all 1-byte messages
instead... :-)
bob wyman
