All makes sense to me.
Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> At 14:59 29/10/2003, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> ><Quote>
> >For accessibility, the presentational form has to vary to meet end user
> >need, yet here they mandate binding them.
> ></Quote>
> >
> >Are these two requirements (varying the presentational form to meet user
> >needs and binding presentation with content and context) orthogonal?
>
> I think so.
>
> orthogonal
>
> adj. [from mathematics] Mutually independent; well
> separated; sometimes, irrelevant to.
>
> If that's the implied meaning.
>
> E.g.
>
> I read braille.
> You read print,.
>
> Presentational form varies.
> (data identical, just needs a transform).
>
> If the 'final form' varies, then the supplier (US Gov) can't store just the
> single
> triple? It must store exceptions too, e.g. my braille presentational form,
> content and context.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> regards DaveP
