At 06:54 2003-10-25 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>As a document validation language RNG is simpler, more
>expressive and less verbose than W3C XML Schema. As a
>datayping language W3C XML Schema is the only game in
>town [...]
Can you (or someone else) elaborate on this? I don't understand what
features are missing från RNG as a "datatyping language" (what's that?). It
has the existing datatypes from WXS, it has the ability to construct regex
patterns, it has named patterns for complex types. What's not there?
I think the day Microsoft turns to RNG will be a lucky day for XML.
Gustaf
