David Carlisle scripsit:
> Being able to read as far as the encoding declaration using only
> characters < 127 in the vast majority of cases is a real benefit,
The Core WG agreed.
> if NEL is allowed there, that benefit is lost, if it is special cased
> and not allowed there, that is just covering up the symptoms of a bad
> change (and keeping the "injustice" that NEL style line breaks are
> second class).
XML 1.1 is almost certainly going to ban line breaks in the XML and text
declarations altogether. They don't buy anyone anything.
--
Said Agatha Christie / To E. Philips Oppenheim John Cowan
"Who is this Hemingway? / Who is this Proust?
Who is this Vladimir / Whatchamacallum, http://www.reutershealth.com
This neopostrealist / Rabble?" she groused. http://www.ccil.org/cowan
--author unknown to me; any suggestions?
