RE: [xml-dev] fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group

> We have requests to support things such as the Japanese 
> calendar or complex numbers in DSDL and I think we'd better 
> find a way to let people define what they need rather than 
> attempting to be "universal" and define all the possible datatypes.

Doesn't this just change the problem from defining all possible types to one
of defining all possible facets? Is that really any easier?