> Are you saying it doesn't make sense to ask why ASN.1 has been
> vulnerable to long-lived bugs? We are not talking about just one
> bug in just one implementation.
In every case so far, it's been untested code paths. As others have
said, that's not ASN1/[BDPX]ER's fault.
> Using a technology without studying its past failures is not good
> engineering practice.
Thanks for the lesson.
/r$
--
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html